| Painting: No Detail is
Unimportant
David Waldstreicher sought to show how local celebrations and political
events reflected broader issues in Early America. When he looked at this
portrait of this local New Haven official, he could have seen just another
dry portrait of a vain man. Instead, a small detail in this portrait
cinched his broader argument.
When Abraham Bishop decided to have his portrait painted..., he posed
with the emblems of his office: the pen and ledger book he used as the
newly appointed collector of the Port of New Haven. As in most contemporary
portraits of provincial gentlemen, there is no explanation of these devices
or any direct reference to the geographical or social setting.
This
painting, like Bishop himself, was going nowhere; anyone who saw it probably
knew the sitter and where he sat. Yet the ledger book is open to a nearly
blank page. Bishop, pen in hand, seems to have written only a curious notation:
162.
This, the tally of electoral votes for Jefferson in the presidential
contest of 1804, was apparently Bishop's proudest achievement. Like the
Litchfield, Connecticut, newspaper that carried a similar notation on its
masthead ("162 vs. 14"), Bishop wanted to be known for his faith in the
many over the few, for his links to a national political movement, and
for his untiring efforts to bring Connecticut over to the Jeffersonian
side.
David Waldstreicher. In the Midst of Perpetual Fetes: The Making
of American Nationalism, 1776-1820. Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press, 1998, p. 182-3.
Home | Top | Know
What You're Reading | What to Look For | Circling
the Image | Hints on Notetaking | Using
Your Notes | Writing Papers & The
Library | Glossary of Terms | Outline
of Site | Credits
|