
By N. Alice YamadaChief of Staff |
his is an article that I wish anyone in the teaching position would read. I have been a student for over twelve years now including my three years at Trinity. I have seen both great and terrible professors and have attended mundane and exciting lectures. In these different learning settings, I have started to develop a criteria for what the purpose of teaching should be. Teachers, especially college professors, are not completely fulfilling their job responsibilities unless the students are able to learn, as well as able to enjoy the material and the process of learning. Unfortunately, the latter of their jobs are excluded in the consciousness of many college professors. They assume that since a student is enrolled in the course, he or she must be highly interested, highly "trained," and able to understand what is SO simple for them to understand. As any student will know, that is NOT the case. We enroll in classes because we are interested, and it is the professor's job to enhance this interest in the most enjoyable way possible. In many cases, we do not have the "base" knowledge that professors assume us to have, and it is here that marks a good professor from a bad one. Good professors are able to make this lack of "expertise" into a pleasant learning experience, while bad professors simply make us feel dumb and leave the "ignorant" in the dark, left behind only due to the lack of ability and professionalism of the professor.
|
|
|