Trinity Begins Accreditation Process
President Jones has
appointed a steering committee to oversee preparations as the
College gets set to undergo a reaccreditation evaluation as required
by the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (CIHE) of the
New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC). Accredited
institutions normally go through comprehensive evaluations at least
every ten years. Trinity’s last evaluation was in 1995; an extension
was granted in consideration of the College’s recent presidential
transition.
NEASC is a
self-regulatory membership organization that serves the public and
educational communities by developing and applying standards that
assess the effectiveness of elementary, secondary, and collegiate
educational institutions. For the most part, CIHE’s work is
performed by volunteers affiliated with member institutions in
coordination with a small professional staff.
Chaired by Associate
Professor of English and American Studies Margo Perkins and Vice
President for Planning, Administration, and Affirmative Action Paula
Russo, the College’s steering committee comprises members of the
faculty and administration; subcommittees to be formed in the future
will include additional faculty and staff members as well as
students. “It is critically important that we incorporate a
cross-section of the campus community as we move forward,” explains
President Jones. “We are embarking upon a serious, comprehensive
self-study as part of this process. It really is an invaluable
opportunity to focus our attention, in detail, on specific aspects
of the College—especially as they relate to the Cornerstone Planning
Process.”
The self-study to which Jones refers
is perhaps the most crucial element of the accreditation exercise.
According to CIHE guidelines, “To become accredited, and
periodically thereafter, institutions are asked to engage in
comprehensive and rigorous self-examination … Usually lasting a year
to 18 months, self-study involves the college or university
community in measuring and verifying its achievements and
identifying ways in which the fulfillment of institutional
objectives can be improved.” Trinity’s self-study will concentrate
on three areas of special emphasis: intellectual engagement and
campus community, budgeting and planning processes, and urban and
global engagement. All three areas are of particular importance to
the ongoing Cornerstone project and a recent report by the
President’s Budget Council identified them as priorities on which to
focus during the next three to five years.
“We are hoping that this process will
allow us to gain some clarity and unity as to what our priorities
are, and should be, as a college,” says Perkins. “There are so many
great programs here that deserve support, and this self-examination
process should help us to reassert the direction of the institution.
We want to get buy-in from all areas of campus because, going
forward, we’re going to have to make decisions that affect us
all.”
The findings of the self-study, as
well as priorities and strategies for quality enhancement identified
through the process, will be summarized in a self-study report. This
document is submitted to CIHE along with certain specified
institutional materials such as the college catalog and completed
data forms provided by CIHE. Following its completion, the
self-study report serves as a basis for evaluation by an on-site
team of peer evaluators, who are administrators and faculty from
other accredited colleges and universities. Typically lasting three
days and following procedures outlined in the CIHE evaluation
manual, the on-site evaluation will seek to assess the College in
light of the self-study and eleven standards for accreditation.
Those eleven standards are: mission and purpose; planning and
evaluation; organization and governance; the academic program;
faculty; students; library and other information resources; physical
and technological resources; financial resources; public disclosure;
and integrity. Representatives from CIHE are scheduled to be on
campus in April, 2007.
“We have to address the standards for
accreditation that are set by CIHE and adopted by the member
institutions,” notes Russo. “That’s one part of the process. At the
same time, we would like to build on the work that has already been
done in the self-study portion of the process. We have people who
were involved in other planning processes—like the Cornerstone
Advisory Committees and the curricular review. We will be consulting
people from every area of the College.”
For further information about the
accreditation process, please go to:
http://www.trincoll.edu/TrinityAZ/planning/reaccreditation/.
back
to top
Return to eQuad table of
contents
|