
Support from the Nellie Mae Education Foundation
First-year college students
sometimes face barriers to their dreams instead of gateways.
For students of color the obstacles can be particularly daunting. It is widely recognized that, across the country, fewer of
these students graduate and fewer achieve high academic success when compared
with the general student population. At
Trinity, a groundbreaking effort to confront and remedy this problem has
recently attracted the support of the prestigious Nellie Mae Education
Foundation, New England’s largest public charity dedicated exclusively to
improving academic achievement among the region’s under-served communities.
With three grants totaling $236,000, the Foundation has generously
supported the innovative Consortium on High Achievement and Success, a working
group of 33 like-minded, highly selective colleges and universities formed at
Trinity’s invitation to tackle the challenges of retention and achievement
among minority students. “This
is one of our flagship grants,” says Blenda J. Wilson, president and chief
executive officer of the Nellie Mae Education Foundation.
“In my mind, the Consortium constitutes a leading-edge effort to
promote minority student achievement at the college level.
It is a credit to Trinity to have taken the lead.”
The Consortium grew from a Trinity
College Retention Task Force formed in 1998 and led by Vice President for
Student Services Sharon H. Herzberger. The far-reaching group drew its membership from across the
campus. In addition to faculty and
students, administrators from every department were invited to serve, including
alumni relations, residential life, admissions, the health center, financial
aid, and multi-cultural affairs ¾
everyone who has a role to play in the academic life of minority students.
“We knew we needed to make this an institution-wide initiative,”
Herzberger says. The group explored
why students of color graduate at “lower and slower rates,” and provided
recommendations for solutions. Among
them were providing more proactive advising, increased peer support, a diverse
array of social and cultural activities, and the assurance of faculty
participation. Several
recommendations have already been instituted.
For example, special academic support programs were created, including
retention teams that work with students when a need for intervention is
identified. In addition, the
religious life program at the College was broadened to support the spiritual and
religious needs of all members of our diverse community.
Notably, one task force
recommendation resulted in an effort to collaborate with other colleges and
universities about common concerns regarding retention.
The task force held a conference on promoting academic success and
student satisfaction, drawing 145 representatives from some 30 colleges and
universities to the Trinity campus. The
conference focused on how to retain minority students and ensure that they lead
satisfying lives while in college. Impressed
by the budding coalition, the Nellie Mae Education Foundation awarded $10,000 to
support the conference, and then another $50,000 to solidify the group as a
consortium of schools. The
Consortium is dedicated to encouraging colleges and universities to achieve
parity across all groups of students on outcome measures related to high
achievement, graduation, leadership, and satisfaction.
Early in 2002,
the Foundation awarded an additional $176,000 to help the Consortium deepen its
commitment to collaboration on the challenging work of retention and high
achievement. One major goal is to
eliminate obstacles to initial success at college ¾
a key problem in overall retention. The
barriers, say Consortium members, often come in the form of entry-level,
introductory math and science courses. These
courses are crucial stepping stones in careers such as medicine and engineering,
and can be difficult for many students. A
study at Trinity found that approximately 18 percent of students who enroll in
introductory chemistry courses do poorly or withdraw from the class.
For some students of color, these courses can be especially challenging.
That same Trinity study found that half of those failing or withdrawing
from introductory chemistry courses are minority students, even though they
represent only one-third of the students enrolled.
Says Herzberger: “There
are courses like this on every campus. Instead
of serving as a gateway, they are proving to be barriers.”
According to
Ann E. Reuman, associate dean of students, it is difficult to explain why such
courses disproportionately disrupt the academic life of students of color, but
secondary school preparation and class climate may be factors.
“Since there are more white students in any given science class, my
guess is that more of them had advantages in high school in terms of the hard
sciences,” Reuman says. And once on campus, minorities may find it more difficult to
participate fully in class. “Students
of color may not ask a question in a class full of white people,” Reuman says.
“They may feel as if they are
being judged even before they speak.”
Such problems
have led five Consortium member institutions — Barnard College, Union College,
Haverford College, the College of the Holy Cross, and Trinity — to launch a
“barrier course project” aimed at identifying solutions.
Holy Cross and Trinity have developed pilot projects to test key elements
of intervention, such as the use of “supplemental instruction” (SI) study
groups, which were originally designed for large university settings.
Led by specially trained and supervised teaching assistants, the groups
are open to all students in a given class and are not remedial.
In contrast to conventional tutoring, the teaching assistant attends
classes with the students so that he or she remains up to date with the lessons
as they are being taught. The
overall goal is to encourage students to solve their own problems, to form study
partnerships, and to practice their new resourcefulness so that in test
situations they can quickly address the questions before them.
“Our interest is not to make the courses easier; it would be
inappropriate at a select private college to do so,” says Herzberger.
“Instead our intention is to figure out what support services and
pedagogy are needed to enable the success that we know students are capable of
attaining.”
Early results
have been extremely promising. At
Trinity, a supplemental instruction test group focused on an introductory
chemistry class taught by Assistant Professor Maria L. Parr ’90. In a class of 37 students, 17 (46 percent) participated in
“SI” sessions, and none of these students withdrew or received a grade lower
than a C-minus. Of the 20 students
who did not participate in “SI” sessions, 5 (25 percent) withdrew, passed
with a D, or failed. The results
show that considerable improvement is possible.
“These entry level courses are pathways to medical and science
careers,” says the Foundation’s Wilson.
“They are crucial linchpin courses for anyone who aspires to these
careers.” Through its grant, the
Nellie Mae Education Foundation is enthusiastically supporting solutions that
achieve positive outcomes.
The barrier course project is just one small part of the Consortium’s work. The Nellie Mae Education Foundation grant also supports plans to:
· Convene the presidents of Consortium colleges and universities, bringing the challenge of retention to the attention of those with the most power to steer an achievement agenda on campuses across the nation.
· Identify and implement remedies for the special needs of African-American and Latino men. “On our campus, just as on all Consortium campuses, when we look at which groups of students tend to be the least satisfied with their collegiate experience, it is African-American and Latino men,” says Herzberger.
· Generate a Consortium databank. Led by Vassar College, this project will measure the problems and their solutions through a wide net of data gathering across the variety of member institutions and their student subgroups.
· Organize meetings for targeted professionals, such as coaches or career services officers, to ensure that the success and satisfaction of students of color are salient concerns to all campus decision-makers.
· Create a Consortium Steering Board and hire administrative staff.
The
groundbreaking work of the new Consortium dovetails with the Foundation’s
central mission to provide access to higher education and improve the lives of
the region’s underserved communities. The
Nellie Mae Education Foundation, formed in 1998 with the proceeds generated from
the acquisition of the Nellie Mae Corporation by Sallie Mae, calls such access a
“fundamental civil right” of the 21st century, and “a basic necessity of
our common lives both today and in the months and years to come.
Ensuring that the diversity of the nation is reflected in the diversity
of its leaders is essential to our shared future.”
Still, the minority achievement gap stands as a persistent, vexing, and
complicated national problem ¾
people of color continue to underachieve at all levels of education and at all
socio-economic levels. For the
Nellie Mae Education Foundation, the Consortium ¾
by its very existence and through its pioneering work ¾
serves as a key strategy in the search for remedies.
“For the first time, this group of very prestigious colleges and
universities admits there is a real problem,” says Wilson.
“That in itself is an achievement.”
| Consortium
on High Achievement and Success Member Institutions |
|||
| Amherst College | Colgate Universtiy | Lafayette College | Swarthmore College |
| Bard Collge | College of the Holy Cross | Middlebury College | Trinity College* |
| Barnard College* | Colorado College | Mount Holyoke College | Union College |
| Bates College | Connecticut College | Oberlin College | University of the South |
| Bowdoin College | Dartmouth College | Pomona College | Vassar College* |
| Brandeis University | Franklin & Marshall College | Reed College | Washington and Lee University |
| Bucknell University | Hamilton College | Sarah Lawrence College | Wesleyan University |
| Clark University | Haverford College* | Smith College | Williams College |
| Colby College* |
* Steering Board Institutions |
||