M A U R I C E . W A D E |
|
The following feature article appeared in the campus
publication Mosaic in September, 2001. Using philosophy to address social issues
Wade’s socially conscious passion for philosophy perhaps can be traced back to his undergraduate studies at Yale University. There, he studied psychology before being drawn to philosophy by his interest in a school of psychology developed after World War II that combined existentialism and psychology. “It came out of the reflections of European psychologists on the various traumas of WWII, which provoked the question of how do you maintain psychological health in the context of a world where this kind of evil can happen. In order to continue the study of existentialism and questions of that sort, I had to move over into philosophy,” Wade explains. Wade’s
deep interest in philosophy and its value in addressing social issues is a
current that runs through not only his role as chair of the philosophy
department, but also his role as director of the College’s public policy
program. A unique look at public policy John
Alcorn, associate director of Italian programs and member of the faculty
in public policy studies, has a first-hand appreciation of Wade’s
ability to bring philosophical thought processes to students in the
program as they explore a range of policy issues. “What
I like is that he’s a first-rate philosopher who takes science and the
social sciences seriously,” Alcorn says. “That’s the right
combination for heading up a public policy program so the students get a
nicely integrated and balanced approach.” Changes behind, changes ahead “On
the score of diversity, things have changed a great deal,” he says,
citing a trend of increased minority enrollment since his arrival. “If
you compare Trinity 18 years ago to Trinity today, quite a bit has
changed. There has been quite a bit of improvement.” He cites the
College’s office of multicultural affairs as a valuable resource for
addressing issues of diversity on campus. “Bringing someone like [Dean of Multicultural Affairs] Karla Spurlock-Evans onto campus is going to help us deal with diversity and multiculturalism in creative and useful sorts of ways, so that we aren’t just doing something politically correct because it’s politically correct. We’re doing something that is important to the basic educational mission of the College,” Wade says. He feels that the increasingly broad curriculum and the kinds of courses being offered further reflect the College’s commitment to diversity. Wade
also cites an increase in faculty collaboration, particularly
interdepartmental collaboration, as another valuable step to further
enriching the academic climate of the Trinity community.
This collaborative spirit resonates with Wade’s colleague Drew
Hyland, Charles A. Dana professor of philosophy. “He
is one of the best philosophical conversationalists I know,” Hyland says
of Wade. “I never try to publish an article without making sure that
Maurice hears it first and I get a chance to benefit from his responses.
All of us in the department benefit from his ability to listen carefully
to our ideas and respond in the most constructively critical way.” Philosophy in action “One
of the things that an education in philosophy gives students is the
ability to make judgments, hold beliefs, and pursue knowledge even while
understanding that the world is largely contingent,” Wade explains.
“There are no guarantees when it comes to belief, knowledge, and action,
but, nonetheless, we have to try to believe, know, and act deliberately
and reflectively. Philosophy can be really helpful in enabling one to live
as a rational, reflective person in an inevitable world of uncertainty and
ambiguity.” Wade charges students to utilize the skills they acquire at Trinity to solve the “increasingly complex” challenges with which they will be faced and predicts that issues of collective racial and ethnic identity and class differences will be salient for some time to come. “It’s
increasingly a much more complicated world for individuals and groups than
ever before. I think because certainty is hard to come by—because
complete clarity is hard to come by—lots of people give up on dealing
with ambiguity and uncertainty by turning to something utterly dogmatic
that gives them the answer to everything,” Wade argues. “When
places like Trinity succeed at doing what we’re doing, we will equip
people to deal with uncertainty, ambiguity, and contingency without giving
up and going in a completely dogmatic direction.” –Michael Bradley |