Back to Homepage 

Targeted Professionals’ Meeting for Psychological Counseling

Hosted by Barnard College on April 3, 2002

Meeting Summary:

 Hosted by Dr. Laura Smith and Dr. Marjorie Silverman, the Meeting was the first in a series designed to extend interest in promoting high achievement and satisfaction among students of color.  The Meeting goals were the following:

  • Share information that allows each college to develop an Action Plan for their campus

  • Review “Best Practices” for each area of student support services

  • Potentially develop group projects to allow cross-institutional cooperation

The five-hour meeting opened with a presentation by keynote speaker Dr. Madonna Constantine, Associate Professor of Psychology and Education at Teachers College, Columbia University.  Dr. Constantine focused on

  • multi-cultural counseling competency in the college setting
  • relationship between this and satisfaction with counseling among students of color
  • identifying potential helping skills in relation to providing counseling to SOC

Dr. Constantine challenged counselors to reconsider their roles in the counseling setting and in relation to their university.  Several roles were offered as possibilities, including consultant, advocate, and educator.  She also discussed connecting students with other helping resources.  Understanding the situational and environmental impact on students’ psychological issues was strongly emphasized, and is highly relevant for many students of color whose experiences of prejudice exert influence on their college experience.

For some participants, this approach represented a new way of working, as their training and practice focused on concerns of the internal psyche, and not the external environment.  Action plans will work towards resolving this challenge for counseling services.

Multi-cultural counseling competence was a main theme.  In discussion, it became apparent that this concept is relevant to sexual orientation and socio-economic class as well as race and ethnicity.

Outreach was discussed as a means of overcoming the stigma attached to counseling by some cultural groups, and the fear for some students of acknowledging “weakness”.

The idea of conducting outreach programming presented difficulties for some participants, however.  Several felt that a presence in the college community threatened their ability to continue their particular method of counseling, as they did not wish to be seen outside of their counseling role; others felt that they were already understaffed, and were not sure that their staffs could meet these additional demands.  This obstacle will also be addressed where necessary in Action Plans.

The possibility of group counseling was raised as a solution for serving increased numbers of clients resulting from outreach work.  The possibility of collaborating with other faculty and staff in outreach work was proposed in response to reservations about engaging in outreach.

Assessing client satisfaction was another important element.  Constantine’s own research offered examples of variables to consider.  They include: client demographics, ATSPPHS-S (cultural aversion to counseling), counselor rating, and a cross-cultural counseling inventory.                                 

For all it is important to consider the cultural norms of their campuses and counseling centers and what role the university expects them to play on the campus.

Commitments were made to produce action plans for each attending campus by June 15.  The participants expressed the desire to meet again.

 Back to Homepage