About Trinity Academics
Student Life Admissions Living and Learning Urban-Global Connections
Trinity A-Z Directory Search
+Mission
+CLI Final Presentations
+News
+Structure
+Models and Syllabi
+Minor in Community Action
+Getting Started
+Internet Resources
+CL courses Fall 2008
+Contact Us
+Faculty Development Workshops
+Community Development
+CLI Newsletters
+Other Community Programs
+CLI in Pictures
home:ug:ue:cli:analyzing schools fall 2005
Urban Engagement
Educational Studies 200: Analyzing Schools

 

 

Fall 2005

TR 9:55-11:10am       

McCook 225

 

Assistant Prof. Andrea Dyrness        

McCook 312                          

Email: andrea.dyrness@trincoll.edu

 

Associate Prof. Jack Dougherty

McCook 302

Phone: 297-2296

Email: jack.dougherty@trincoll.edu

 

Introduction:

analysis (noun, plural analyses; adjective analytical; verb analyze)
1. The separation of a whole into constituents with a view to its 
examination and interpretation.
 
This course introduces the study of schooling within an interdisciplinary 
framework. Drawing upon sociology, we investigate the resources, structures, 
and social contexts which influence student opportunities and outcomes in 
theUnited States and other countries. From psychology, we contrast theories 
of learning, both in the abstract and in practice. From philosophy, we examine 
competing educational goals and their underlying assumptions regarding human 
nature, justice, and democracy. In addition, a community learning component, 
where students observe and participate in nearby K-12 classrooms for three 
hours per week, will be integrated with course readings and written 
assignments.
 
Readings: 

Available at bookstore in Ed Studies section: 

DC Phillips and Jonas Soltis, Perspectives on Learning, fourth edition. (New York: Teachers College Press, 2004). ISBN 0807744476; $18

 

 Additional readings will be made available in class.

 

 

Evaluation:  

Six 2-3 page analysis papers 

6 x 10  =60 pts

            #1 Social Context of Schooling

            #2 Theories of Learning

            #3 Explaining Educational Inequality                       

            #4 School-based Reform Strategies

            #5 Curriculum Project Proposal

            #6 Philosophy of Education

 

Classroom Participant-Observation (evaluated by classroom teacher)  =15 pts

Curriculum Project - Oral Presentation (evaluated by coordinators)     =10 pts

Curriculum Project – Final Draft        (evaluated by instructor)          =15 pts

Cumulative Final Exam                                                                =10 pts

 

NOTE: Initially, the total number of points equals 110. When calculating the final grade, your lowest 10-point grade will be dropped, resulting in an adjusted total of 100 points.

 

Be advised that adequate work earns a C, good work earns a B, and outstanding work earns an A in this class. Students are expected to engage in academic honesty in all forms of work for this course. If this is unclear to you, ask for clarification.

 

The late assignment penalty is a 10% reduction for every 12-hour period beyond the deadline, with exceptions granted only for documented medical & family emergencies.

 

Please notify us during the first week if you require any special accommodations.

 

How to succeed in this course:

• Class begins on time and we expect you to be present at every session from start to finish. If you run into a one-time scheduling conflict with our class, be sure to consult with us (by email, phone, or in person) BEFORE the conflict to inquire about alternative arrangements. If you become ill or have a family emergency, then email or phone us to inquire about what you’re missing and how to compensate.

 

• Participate regularly in class discussions and bring the relevant readings and notes with you. While there is no formal “participation” grade, actively engaging in discussions (both inside and outside of the classroom) will help you learn the material. At the same time, remember that being a reflective listener is crucial to meaningful discussions, especially when the views of others differ from your own.

 

• The short analysis papers require students to bridge theoretical readings with the participant-observation experiences in Hartford schools. They also serve as the primary evaluation tool in this course, so look for feedback about improving your writing.

 

• The instructor is assisted by TAs who attend all classes, facilitate small group discussions, and write comments on (but not grade) written assignments. Make an appointment with any one of us to talk about improving your learning in the course.

 

Tue Sept 6th Introduction to Syllabus & Placements in Hartford Public Schools

 

Participant-Observation Guidelines:

Clusters of students will be assigned to work with classroom teachers in five different schools in the area. In each school, a coordinator has been designated to help organize placements, guide orientations, and facilitate communication with classroom teachers.

 

Hartford Public Schools website:                   http://www.hartfordschools.org/

            HPS info on weather-related closings:           695-SNOW (695-7669)

 

Trinity Ed Studies Program website:  http:/www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ

 

Students will work as “participant-observers” with their classroom teachers for at least 8 three-hour sessions (a total of 24 hours) over the course of the semester. The objectives are for Trinity students to:

·         Integrate theoretical readings with first-hand experience, in order to complete the 6 analysis paper assignments required in the course

·         Develop meaningful relationships with students and teachers, to deepen our reflections on the contexts of urban schools and the purposes of education

·         Identify potential resources and gain practical experience for designing a curriculum project

           

Clusters of students will attend a mandatory orientation session during the second week of the course with their school coordinator. (Exact times TBA).

 

During the initial visit with the teacher, students will complete a basic contract to establish their schedule and role in the classroom. “Participant-observation” is more than just quietly watching; it includes more active roles in the classroom, such as one-on-one tutoring, working with small groups, preparing materials for a classroom project, and (in some cases) planning and teaching a brief lesson.

 

At the end of the semester, school coordinators will evaluate Trinity students’ placement experiences based on their level of engagement, reliability, and effort demonstrated in the classroom.

 

Unit 1: The Social Context of Schooling: perspectives from anthropology and sociology of education

Question: How does the social context of schooling impact learning and educational outcomes?

 

Thurs Sept. 8:  Images of urban education

 

Sophie Bell, “Dangerous Morals: Hollywood Puts a Happy Face on Urban Education,” Radical Teacher 54 (1998): 23-27.

 

Pedro Noguera, City Schools and the American Dream.  Series Foreword & Preface; Chapter 1, “Finding Hope Among the Hopeless”, Chapter 2, “The Social Context and Its Impact on Inner-City Schools” (New York: Teacher’s College Press, 2003), pp.vii-xiv and 1-40. 

 

Video excerpts in class: Stand and Deliver, fictionalized portrayal of Jaime Escalante, (1988). [Trinity Library VID 0730]

 

Tues Sept. 13: Education and socialization, Part I:

 

Kathleen de Marrais and Margaret LeCompte, “The social organization of schooling” and “What is taught in schools,” in The Way Schools Work: A Sociological Analysis of Education, third edition (NY: Longman, 1999), 43-52, 222-228, 236-247.

 

Laurie Olsen, Introduction and Chapter 2, “The maps of Madison High: On separation and invisibility,” in Made in America: Immigrant Students in Our Public Schools (NY: The New Press, 1997), pp. 9-28 and 37-57.

 

Distribute: Paper topic #1, DUE  Monday Sept. 19

 

Special Event: Evening lecture by Claude Steele, social psychologist from Stanford University and author of several works on “stereotype threat” to be read later this semester

 

Thurs Sept. 15: Education and socialization, Part II

 

Hervé Varenne & Ray McDermott (1999). Successful Failure: The School America Builds. Preface, Introduction p. 1-7, and Chapter 1, “Adam, Adam, Adam, and Adam: The Cultural Construction of a Learning Disability,” pp. 25-43. ( CO: Westview Press.)

 

Unit 2: Theories of Learning

Question: How do classical and contemporary theorists explain how people learn?

 

Tue     Sept 20            Classical Theory and Behaviorism

Read:   Phillips and Soltis, Perspectives on Learning, intro and chapters 1-4

 

Distribute: Learning vignette writing pre-assignment

 

Thur   Sept 22            Constructivist Theories: Piaget, Dewey, and Vygotsky

Read:   Phillips and Soltis, Perspectives on Learning, chapters 5-6

 

Video excerpt in class: First Graders Divide 62 by 5 (TC Press, 1999). VID 2730

 

Tue     Sept 27            Constructivist Theories: Bruner

Read:   Phillips and Soltis, Perspectives on Learning, chapter 7

 

Video excerpt in class: A Private Universe (Annenberg/CPB, 1987). [Ed Res Ctr]

See companion website: http://www.learner.org/teacherslab/pup/

 

Distribute: Paper topic #2, DUE Tuesday Oct 4th

 

Thur   Sept 29            Making Sense of Theories of Learning

Read:  Phillips and Soltis, Perspectives on Learning, chapter 9

 

Tue     Oct 4               Learning and Individual Differences

Read:  Rachel Gottlieb, “Special-Needs Students to Mix In: Fall Classes Open to Mainstreaming” Hartford Courant, July 3, 2005.

 

Unit 3: Explaining Educational Inequality

Questions: How do different theories attempt to explain racial, social class, and gender gaps in educational achievement?

 

Thurs. Oct. 6  The Intelligence Debate

 

Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray (1994), The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, Preface and Introduction. (New York: Free Press Paperbacks)

 

Fischer et. al (1995), “But Is It Intelligence?” and “Who wins? Who loses?”(excerpts) in Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.) pp. 55-69, 70-74, 86-93.

 

Selected data from SAT and National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

 

NOTE: For next class, print out and read “Strategic School Profile” for your school. Go to CT Dept of Education, School Information website:

http://www.csde.state.ct.us/public/der/schools/index.htm

            School Profiles > Regular Education by School 2004-05 > Hartford [find school]

 

Tues. Oct. 11 – no class – Trinity days

 

Thurs. Oct. 13  School Finance and Tracking

 

Jonathan Kozol, “Children of the City Invincible: Camden, New Jersey,” in Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools. (NY: Crown, 1991), Chapter 4.

 

Jeannie Oakes, “The Distribution of Knowledge,” in Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality (New Haven: Yale Press, 1985), Chapter 4.

 

“Strategic School Profile” for your placement school [see directions above]

 

In class: Analyze metropolitan Hartford data; handout from Iva Kuzyk, Hartford Primer and Field Guide, 2nd edition. (Hartford: Trinity College, 2003), pp. 100-103.

 

Tues. Oct. 18  Class Inequality: Social Reproduction Theories

 

Janny Scott and David Leonhardt, “Class in America: Shadowy Lines That Still Divide,” in The New York Times (May 15, 2005).

 

Jay MacLeod, “Social Immobility in the Land of Opportunity” (excerpts) and “Social Reproduction in Theoretical Perspective,” Chapters 1-2 in Ain’t No Makin’ It (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), pp. 3-7, 11-23.

 

Annette Lareau, “Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The Importance of Cultural Capital,” (excerpts) in Sociology of Education 60 (1987), pp. 73-85.

 

Thurs. Oct. 20  Race and Educational Outcomes, Part I

 

John Ogbu, “Immigrant and Involuntary Minorities in Comparative Perspective,” in M. Gibson and J. Ogbu, eds., Minority Status and Schooling (NY: Garland, 1991).

 

Ray McDermott, “The Explanation of Minority School Failure, Again,” in Anthropology and Education Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1987. 361-364.

 

Ann Ferguson, “Don’t Believe the Hype” (excerpt) and “The Punishing Room,” in Bad Boys: Public Schools in the Making of Black Masculinity. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 1-3, 29-47.

 

Distribute Paper topic #3: DUE  Friday Oct 28th

 

Tues. Oct. 25:  Race and Educational Outcomes, Part II: Stereotypes

 

Claude Steele, “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance,” reprinted in Eugene Lowe, ed., Promise and Dilemma: Perspectives on Racial Diversity and Higher Education (Princeton, 1999), excerpt from pp. 107-108.

 

Claude Steele, “Thin Ice: Stereotype Threat and Black College Students,” in The Atlantic Monthly (August 1999), pp. 44-49.

http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99aug/9908stereotype.htm

 

Stacey Lee, “Asian Americans: The Absent Minority, the Silenced Minority, and the Model Minority,” and “Academic Achievement Among Asian Americans,” Chapters 1 and 3 in Unraveling the ‘Model Minority’ Stereotype: Listening to Asian American Youth (New York: Teachers College Press, 1996), pp. 1-16 and 52-69.

 

Video excerpt in class: Secrets of the SAT (PBS Frontline, 1999) [Ed Res Center]

See full interview with Claude Steele at:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/interviews/steele.html

 

Thurs. Oct. 27: Gender Bias

 

Myra and David Sadker, “Hidden Lessons,” Failing at Fairness: How America’s Schools Cheat Girls (NY: Scribners, 1994), Chapter 1.

 

AAUW, Gender Gaps Executive Summary: Where Schools Still Fail Our Children (Washington, DC: AAUW, 1998).

http://www.aauw.org/research/girls­_education/gg.cfm

 

Robert Frahm and Rachel Gottlieb, “Merits of Single-Sex Classes Debated,” Hartford Courant, March 5, 2004.

 

Unit 4: School-based Reform Strategies

Question: How do different school-based reform strategies attempt to improve education? What assumptions do these strategies make about the causes of educational inequality?

 

Tues    Nov 1              Cooperative Learning

Read: Robert Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, Practice, 2nd edition. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995), chapters 1 and 2.

 

In class: Cooperative learning exercise

 

Thurs  Nov 3              Detracking and Multiculturalism

Video: Michelle Fine et. al., Off-Track: Classroom Privilege for All (Teachers College Press, 1998). [VID 1931]

 

Read: James Banks, "Approaches to Multicultural Curriculum Reform," in Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives, 5th edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

 

Sonia Nieto, “Multicultural Education in Practice” in Affirming Diversity: The Sociopolitical Context of Multicultural Education, 3rd edition (NY: Longman, 2000).

 

Rita Tenorio, “’Brown Kids Can’t Be in Our Club’: Raising Issues of Race with Young Children,” Rethinking Schools 18 (Spring 2004): 29-32.

 

Tues    Nov  8             Family-School Connections

Read: James Comer et. al., Child by Child: The Comer Process for Change in Education (NY: Teachers College Press, 1999), prologue, part I, chapter 5.

 

Distribute: paper topic #4; DUE in class on Tues, Nov 15th

 

Wed Nov 9 Special Event

Lecture by Simone Schweber, Goodman Professor of Education and Jewish Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, on her new book, Making Sense of the Holocaust: Lessons from Classroom Practice (2004), featuring in-depth case studies of how history is taught and learned in three public high schools. Time and location TBA.

 

Thurs  Nov 10                        Reshaping Teachers' Work

Read: Vivian Troen and Katherine Boles, "The 'Trilemma' Dysfunction." Education Week 14 May 2003. http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=36troen.h22

 

In class: “Pathways toward Teaching” website on the Ed Studies Program website

 

Unit 5: Curriculum Design

Question: How do educators construct instructional units that link rich objectives, activities, and evaluation components?

 

Tues    Nov 15                        Curriculum Design and Objectives for Student Learning

Read: Bob Peterson, “Measuring Water with Justice: A Multidisciplinary Lesson that Explores Water Issues,” Rethinking Schools 19 (Fall 2004): 33-37.

 

Sample curriculum projects by previous Trinity Ed 200 students [to be assigned].

 

Bloom's Taxonomy

/depts/educ/resources/bloom.htm

 

Howard Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligences

http://www.ibiblio.org/edweb/edref.mi.th.html

 

In class: Curriculum project guidelines and evaluation criteria; exercise on identifying and articulating objectives for student learning

 

Paper topic #5 (proposal) assigned; DUE via Blackboard on Sunday Nov 20th at 9pm

 

Thurs  Nov 17                        Curriculum Design and Activities/Resources

  

Read: Linda Christensen, “Unlearning the Myths that Bind Us: Critiquing Cartoons and Society,” in Reading, Writing, and Rising Up: Teaching about Social Justice and the Power of the Written Word. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, 2000.

 

Kelley Dawson Salas, “Teaching About Toxins: Students Explore the Health Issues Affecting their Community,” Rethinking Schools 18 (Winter 2003): 22-25.

 

Resources:  Go to Ed Studies website (/depts/educ)

Click on “Resources” and see:

            Ed Studies Resource Center (books and videos for loan)

            Educ 200 Curriculum Design Resources (web links)

            Ed 200 Curriculum Projects (PDF and Powerpoint files from previous students)

 

In class: Orientation to print and digital curriculum resources; test Blackboard posting

 

Tues    Nov 22                        Curriculum Design and Evaluation

 

Read: Linda Christensen, “Portfolios and Basketball,” in Reading, Writing, and Rising Up: Teaching about Social Justice and the Power of the Written Word. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, 2000.

 

In class: Feedback delivered on paper #5 (proposal) via Blackboard

 

Thurs Nov 24                        Thanksgiving -- no class

 

 

Unit 6: Philosophy of Education        

Questions: What is the purpose of education? What is worth learning? How should debates over these issues be resolved in a democratic society?

 

Tues. Nov. 29:  Conflicting aims in public education

 

Joel Spring, “The Purposes of Public Schooling,” in American Education, 9th Edition (New York: Longman, 2000), pp. 3-27.

 

Thurs. Dec. 1:  Liberatory Education: Goals and Challenges

 

Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (NY: Seabury Press, 1970), pp. 57-74.

 

bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom (NY: Routledge, 1994), pp. 1-22.

 

Lisa Delpit, “Skills and Other Dilemmas of a Progressive Black Educator,” reprinted in Delpit, Other People’s Children (New York: New Press, 1995), pp. 11-20.

 

Distribute paper topic #6: DUE Thurs Dec 8

 

Tues. Dec. 6:  Education for Democracy

 

Deborah Meier, “In Defense of Public Education,” and “It’s Academic: Why Kids Don’t Want to be ‘Well-Educated’,”,in The Power of Their Ideas (Boston: Beacon Press, 1995), pp. 3-11 and 161-173.

 

Michael Apple, preface (excerpts) and “Pedagogy, Patriotism and Democracy:  Ideology and Education After September 11,” in Ideology and Curriculum, 3rd Edition (RoutledgeFalmer, 2004), pp. vii-xv and 157-171.

 

 

Thur Dec 8     Course evaluations; preparing presentations; review for final

 

NOTE: Oral presentations of curriculum projects (5-10 minutes, with visuals)

to be scheduled for a late afternoon/evening session during end of the semester, with evaluations conducted by the school coordinators.

 

 

Thur Dec 15               Curriculum Project final draft DUE at 12 noon

Please submit a paper version AND a computer file (via email attachment or disk)

 

 

Thurs Dec 20 at 9am             Final exam, short essay responses

 

 

 

 

 

 
webmaster directions